Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 343 · Decided 26 April 2016
State Through CBL/ACB, Hyderabad A.P. v. Dharmana Prased Rao
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 343 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 591
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 398/2016
- Decided
- 26 April 2016
- Bench
- A.K. SIKRI, R.K. AGRAWAL (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC; CrPC Section 362; Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19, 13(2), 13
Headnote
591 STATE THROUGH CBl/ACB, HYDERABAD A.P. v. DHARMANA PRASED RAO (Criminal Appeal No. 398of2016) APRIL 26, 2016 [A.K. SIKRI AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 362 - Prosecution of 14 accused including respondent-accused before Special Court - ulss. 13(2) r!w s. uls. 19 of PC Act - Later, when the Court was informed that no sanction was required, it took cognizance of the offences under PC Act against the respondent-accused - In revision High Court set aside the order of trial court on the ground that taking of cognizance at later stage amounted to review
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)