Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 944 · Decided 4 December 2006
State of Uttaranchal and ANR. v. Dinesh Kumar Sharma
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 944 · [2006] SUPP. 10 S.C.R. 1
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5573/2006
- Decided
- 4 December 2006
- Bench
- AR. LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
B Service Law: Promotion-Seniority-Respondent-employee cannot claim promotion c ji-om date of occurrence of vacancy but can only get promotion and seniority fi·om the time he has been substantively appointed-High Court erred in - understanding and appreciating Rules 17 and 21 of the 1995 date of 'substantive appointment' is the date for determining promotion, seniority and other benefits-UP. Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991-Rule D 8-U.P. Agriculture Group "B" Service Rules, 1995-Rules 17 and 21. f- - The questions which arose for consideration in the present
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)