Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 556 · Decided 18 December 2002

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Sewak and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2002 INSC 556 · [2002] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 503
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 530/1991
Decided
18 December 2002
Bench
M.B. SHAH, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Disposed off
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 302, 148

Headnote

B Penal Code, 1860-Section 302 read with Section 148-Conviction­ Acquillal by High Court-Justification of-Appeal-Held: Acquilla! not justified since High Court on unsubstantial grounds and merely on conjectures C rejected the dying declaration of the deceased which fully established active filing of FIR-Hence order of acquillal set aside as against the accused actively involved. Appeal against acquillal-Interference by Supreme· Court-Scope- D Held: this Court should be slow in interfering with the verdict of acq11i1tal- Jf verdict of acquillal is reasonable, this Court should

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)