Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 405 · Decided 2 July 2013
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dayanand Chakrawarty & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 405 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 1023
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5527/2012
- Decided
- 2 July 2013
- Bench
- G.S. SINGHVI, S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 14
Headnote
Service Law: Superannuation - State framed Regulations, 2005 - Fixing two different ages of superannuation (58 and 60) - For 8 c the employees of one Department, solely on the basis of their source of entry in the service - Propriety and constitutional validity of - Held: The employees from the treated alike for the purpose of superannuation under Regulation 31 of 1978 Regulations - Subsequently no discrimination can be made and differential treatment would not be permissible, solely on the basis of their source of entry - Thus, Regulations, 2005 is unconstitutional and ultra vires E
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)