Supreme Court · 1997 INSC 769 · Decided 28 November 1997
State of U.P and ANR. v. Jogendra Singh and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1997 INSC 769 · [1997] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 581
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2061/1991
- Decided
- 28 November 1997
- Bench
- SUJATA V. MANOHAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
B Service Law-Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules-Rule 56(e) as amended by adding a proviso by UP. Fundamental Rule 56 (Amendment Act), 1976- Applicability-Voluntary Retirement-Persons who retired at a time when proviso was not there-Whether can claim benefit of the proviso-Held, No- C Amending Act of Senior Prosecuting Officer, took voluntary retirement under Fundamental Rule 56 of Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules after completion of thirty one and a half years of service on 12-4-1976. He was granted retirement benefits including pension and D gratuity accordingly. In 1989 about 13 years
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)