Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 4 · Decided 3 January 2006
State of Rajasthan and ANR. v. Mohammed Ayub Naz
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 4 · [2006] 1 S.C.R. 138
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 939/2003
- Decided
- 3 January 2006
- Bench
- H.K. SEMA, AR. LAKSHMANAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Service Rules
Headnote
-. Service law: c Rajasthan Service Rules-Rule 86 (3)--Government servant--long absence from duty-Without intimation to Government-Disciplinary proceeding-Attended by delinquent-Termination of service-Writ Petition-- Single Judge of High Court though found the absence was without satisfactory retrial benefits-Dismissal of appeal in limine by Division Bench " D of High Court-In appeal, held: Since the delinquent was wilfully absent for 3 years without intimation to Government, in view of the Rule, the punishment of termination is just--High Court was not justified in
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)