Supreme Court · 2007 INSC 698 · Decided 14 June 2007
State of Punjab v. Sanjiv Kumar@ Sanju and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2007 INSC 698 · [2007] 7 S.C.R. 1025
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 822/2001
- Decided
- 14 June 2007
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.P. SINGH (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 149, 302, 323, 324
Headnote
B Penal Code, 1860: s. 149----Common object-Meaning and scope of-Difference between 'common object' and 'common intention '-Explained-On facts, the view of C the High Court that there wqs no evidence with regard to sharing of common object by the respondents does not suffer from any infirmity. ss. six of them holding that there was no evidence to show that D these persons shared the common object-Held : High Court's judgment directing acquittal of these six persons suffers from no infirmity. Words and Phrases: Expression 'common object' and 'knew' occurring in s. 149 !PC- E Connotation
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)