Supreme Court · 2007 INSC 134 · Decided 13 February 2007
State of NCT of Delhi v. Ravi Kant Sharma and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2007 INSC 134 · [2007] 2 S.C.R. 540
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 201/2007
- Decided
- 13 February 2007
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H. KAPADIA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 161an, 161(3), 172, 161, 173, 482
Headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-ss.161and172-Gistslobservation ' recorded during interrogation-Non-supply of to the accused-Held, rigluly c not supplied-Accused entitled only to the copy of statement recorded under :!._ s.161. Prosecution case was that PW 193, the Inspector had interrogated PW of interrogation of PW-66. The Prosecution contended that PW-193 had merely D recorded his own observation and the gists cannot be treated as statement of PW66. Trial Court held that even the gists made after interrogating a person amounts to statement under s.161(3) Cr.P.C. and accused is
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)