Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 672 · Decided 10 May 1996
State of Manipur v. Thingujam Brojen Meeti
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 672 · [1996] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 738
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8226/1996
- Decided
- 10 May 1996
- Bench
- S.C. AGRAWAL, G.T. NANAVATI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC; Constitution Article 141
Headnote
Labour Law: Compassionate appointment-Die-in-Hamess Schem&-Dependents of C confinned Work-charged employees-Compassionate appointment-Refusal of-Held : character of a Work-charged employee did not change after confinnati01>-Revised Scheme not applicable to such confinned Work­ charged for Work-charged Staff of PWD!IPC!PHE/Ml/Electricity, Manipur Rules, 1978, Rule 6. D Constitution of India, 1950: A1tic/e 141. Dismissal of SLP by non-speaking orde1--Held : did not amount to acceptance of correctness of bnpugned decision-Hence, did not constitute E law laid down by Supreme
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)