Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 162 · Decided 14 March 2013
State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 162 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 128
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 445/2013
- Decided
- 14 March 2013
- Bench
- P. SATHASIVAM, J.S. KHEHAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302; Evidence Act Section 5to16, 17to31, 32, 60, 6, 11, 25, 26; UAPA Section 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40
Headnote
Evidence Act, 1872 - ss.5 to 16, 17 to 31, 32 and 60 - Appreciation of evidence - Two different cases relating to the 2006 bomb blasts in local trains of Mumbai Suburban Railways - C Separate trials - Different accused in the two cases - Respondents were accused in the first case - in the second case, who were not accused/co-accused in the first case, made confessional statements before officials holding the rank · of Deputy Commissioners of Police who were witnesses in the first D case -Prayer made by respondents to summon the said witnesses as defence witnesses -
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)