Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 289 · Decided 11 July 2001
State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Chaganlal Raghana and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 289 · [2001] 3 S.C.R. 840
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 628/1998
- Decided
- 11 July 2001
- Bench
- K.T. THOMAS, R.P. SETHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Case Partly allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 1208, 23, 114; CrPC Section 222; Arms Act Section 3(2)(i), 3(2)
Headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 : Sections 3(2), 3(3). 3(5), 5 and 6. C Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 Rule I 5(5). Indian Penal Code, 1860 : Sections : 302, 307, 120-B and 384 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : Section 222 D Contract voluntarily made and legally recorded-Confession also stood corroborated on facts-Rejection of such a confession held not valid-Confession held sufficient to hold the accused guilty of hatching the con;piracy for commission E of offences with which charged--Death penalty-Substituted by
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)