Supreme Court · 1961 INSC 17 · Decided 25 January 1961
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ahmad ULLAH.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1961 INSC 17 · [1961] 3 S.C.R. 583
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 120/1960
- Decided
- 25 January 1961
- Bench
- A.K. SARKAR, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 84, 3oz, 302; Evidence Act Section 105
Headnote
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 583 the solicitor for the respondent called upon the appel­ lant to execute the documents they were not bound to do so. We are unable to accord our assent to this proposition. The case upon which the Counsel for the appellant relied, i.e., Ismail Bhai Rahim v. Adam at the date of the offer does not of itself afford a reasonable opportunity to the. promisee of ascertaining that the promisor is able and willing to perform his promise. Unless there is something peculiar in the circum­ stances of that case that case does not lay down good law. It is
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)