Supreme Court · 2008 INSC 883 · Decided 31 July 2008
State of Haryana v. Mai Ram Son of Mam Chand
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2008 INSC 883 · [2008] 11 S.C.R. 586
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 211/2001
- Decided
- 31 July 2008
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Case Allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- NDPS Act Section 17
Headnote
): Narcotic prugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: c ss. 17 and 50. Search - On basis of suspicion - Held: Law does not require recording of elaborate reasons for entertaining suspi- cion about an accused. D Seizure - Of contraband article - Only police officials, PWs 1 and 2 examined Court holding that the prosecution version became vulnerable for non-ex- amination of persons who were not official witnesses - Cor- ~~ rectness of - Held: -Not correct, since no material brought on E record by defence to discredit the evidence of official witnesses and further PWs 1 and 2
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)