Supreme Court · 1997 INSC 32 · Decided 15 January 1997

State of Haryana and ORS. v. Amar Nath Bansal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1997 INSC 32 · [1997] 1 S.C.R. 262
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1514/1994
Decided
15 January 1997
Bench
S.C. AGRAWAL, G.T. NANAVATI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution

Headnote

S e1vice law-Superannuation age-Jind State Civil Se1vices Regulations, Regn. I. 27-Applicability-Jind State Regulation stood repealed by Ordinance No. 1 of S. 2005 and Ordinance No. 16 of S. 2005 issued by the Raj Pramukh C of PEPSU-Notlzwithstanding the fact that Ordinances were tempora1y but becoming the employee of PEPSU and then Punjab State cannot claim to continue in se1vice up to 62 years on basis of Regn. 27 of Jind Service Regulations-General Clause Act 1897. S. 6-f'EPSU Seivice D Regulations (1952), Ait.9.1. E Constitution of India. A1t. l~Treaty between Rulers.to

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)