Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 83 · Decided 31 January 2011

SOU. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2011 INSC 83 · [2011] 2 S.C.R. 261
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 271/2011
Decided
31 January 2011
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR, CYRIAC JOSEPH (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
Domestic Violence Act Section 2(q), 12, 18, 19, 20, 22

Headnote

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - s.2(q) read with proviso thereto - Expression "respondent" A 8 in s. 2(q) - Interpretation of - Complaint under the provisions C of the Act - Whether female members cannot be made parties in proceedings under the Act, as of "respondent" in s.2(q) - Held: Although s.2(q) defines a respondent to mean any adult male person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the o aggrieved person, the proviso to s.2(q) widens the scope of the said definition by including a relative of the husband or

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)