Supreme Court · 1994 INSC 102 · Decided 2 March 1994

SMT. Shanti Bai and Others v. Dinkar Balkrishna Vaidya and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1994 INSC 102 · [1994] 2 S.C.R. 296
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2006/1981
Decided
2 March 1994
Bench
S. MOHAN, M.K. MUKHERJEE (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution

Headnote

Tenancy laws: Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates ControlAc41947-Sec­ C tions 14 and 15-Held, protection for available to assignees of sub-lessee~ Protection available only to lawful sub-lessee~Sub-le:;see cannot create fur­ ther sub-lease-Transfer of PropeTty Act, 1882-Section T was mortgaged by him to D in 1947 and subsequently leased out D by T in favour of S in 1948. Under the lease deed the purpose was mentioned as for residence and shops and the lessee was authorised to ! ' L sub- lease. There was also no prohibition against assignment. In 1949 the , lessee

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)