Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 715 · Decided 9 July 1996

SMT. Mithlesh Kumari and ANR. v. Thakur Sheo Saran Singh and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1996 INSC 715 · [1996] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 287
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1114/1975
Decided
9 July 1996
Bench
M.M. PUNCHHI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
CPC Section 11

Headnote

Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Section 11-Res judicata-P1inciple-Ap­ plicability of A B An estate known as Partapner Raj, at a point of time was owned by C Raja S. The estate known to be an impartible one was governed by the rule of lineal primogeniture. The Raja had five sons, Rs, HS, MS, AS and eldest son, RS and then downwards for generations upto Raja HS. Raja HS died in 1925, leaving behind a mother Rani B, a step mother by the name Rani Rand an adopted minor son, Raja M. Raja M was taken to have succeeded D to the Partapner Raj. He was killed while unmarried and a minor. On the

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)