Supreme Court · 1982 INSC 4 · Decided 14 January 1982

SMT. Anand Kaur v. Pritam Lal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1982 INSC 4 · [1982] 3 S.C.R. 43
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 966/1976
Decided
14 January 1982
Bench
A.D. KOSHAL, V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, R.B. MISRA (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Transfer of Property Act Section 106; Rent Control Act

Headnote

' '· SMT. ANAND KAUR v. PRITAM LAL January 14, 1.982 [A.D. KO!HAL, V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI AND R.B. MISRA, JI.] 43 A 8 Delhi R.nt Control Act-Section 14(1). proviso (a) read with provllO to C 114ction 14(2)-rcope of. When a tenant has ~either paid DOI'. tendered the whole of the 14(1) empowers the Controller to make an order for the recovery of possession of the premises. The proviso to section 14(2) states that no tenant shall be entitled to the benefit under the sub-section if having obtained such benefit once in respect of any premises he again makes a default in the

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)