Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 521 · Decided 18 October 2001
Siddalingamma and ANR. v. Mamtha Shenoy
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 521 · [2001] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 366
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 7292/2001
- Decided
- 18 October 2001
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, R.C. LAHOTI, P. VENKATARAMA REDDI (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Leave Granted & Allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 6; Constitution Article 136; Rent Control Act
Headnote
Rent Control and Evcition: Karnataka Rent Contol Act, 1961 : Section 21(1 )(h). Eviction-Eviction Petition-Bona fide requirement-Held: Rent Con­ trol Legislation generally leans in favour of tenant-However, landlord is treated with some sympathy in the case of eviction of tenant on ground of 1908: Order 6, Rule 17-Amendment-Effect of-Held: On the doctrine of relation back the petition as amended is deemed to have been .filed originally as such-Hence, evidence has to be appreciated in the light of averments made in the amended petition. The appellant No. 1 - landlady filed an
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)