Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 72 · Decided 8 February 2002
Si Abir Ahmad v. Sham Lal and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2002 INSC 72 · [2002] 1 S.C.R. 910
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1605/1999
- Decided
- 8 February 2002
- Bench
- S.S.M. QUADRI, S.N. VARIAVA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Rent Control and Evictio1' : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Extension of Chandigarh) Act, C 1974 (as amended in 1982)-Se.:tions I 3(3) (a) (i) (a), I I and 2(g) and (d)­ 'Shop-cum-flat' premises-Ev1~tion petition on the ground of bondide requirement for residential pur,,oses-Entitlement conveyance and site plan showing that the premises was a non-residential D building-No provision in the dei ign plan/or bedrooms, bathroom or kitchen­ Held, the premises was not a ·esidential building but was part of a non­ residential building-Courts bdow were not justified in
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)