Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 759 · Decided 31 October 2006
Shyamal Kumar Roy v. Sushil Kumar Agarwal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 759 · [2006] SUPP. 8 S.C.R. 47
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4609/2006
- Decided
- 31 October 2006
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act; Stamp Act Section 36, 38, 33
Headnote
B ~ Stamp Act, 1899: .. Sections 36 and 38-Document admitted in evidence-Objection raised later regarding its admissibility-Permissibility of-Held: Not permissible- c Party having consented to the document being marked as exhibit loses his right to reopen the question-West Bengal Amendment Act (5)-Evidence Act, 1882. Parties entered into an agreement for development of suit property. D Dispute arose between them. Respondent filed suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Trial Couii passed interim order of injunction. High Court in revision set aside the order of injunction.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)