Supreme Court · 1964 INSC 47 · Decided 26 February 1964
Shiv Prasad Chunilal Jain v. The State of Maharashtra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1964 INSC 47 · [1964] 6 S.C.R. 920
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 150/1961
- Decided
- 26 February 1964
- Bench
- K. SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R. MUDHOLKAR (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Case Partly allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 34, 467, 109; Constitution Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act Section 10
Headnote
Kumar v. llark RoWng Mills Gaiendragadkar c. J. 1964 February 26 920 SUPREME COURT REPORTS No. 1 in all the three appeals were not entitled to curtail the benefits provided to the appellants by them and that the said benefits were not similar either qualitatively or quan­ titatively to the invalid, could not be considered under Art. 226 of the Constitution; that is a matter which can be appropriately raised in the form of a dispute by the appellants under s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. It is true that the powers conferred on the High Courts under Art. 226 are very wide,
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)