Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 229 · Decided 21 April 2010
Shanti Budhiya Vesta Patel and ORS. v. Nirmala Jayprakash Tiwari and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 229 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 958
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3549/2010
- Decided
- 21 April 2010
- Bench
- MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, RAJENDRA MAL LODHA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC
Headnote
Deed and document: C Power of Attorney (POA) - Party executing the POA is bound by the acts of the POA holder- On facts, predecessor­ in-interest of appellant executed POA in favour of respondent . 9 - On the death of predecessor, all the appellants executed POA in favour the basis of POA, D respondent 9 entered into consent terms with opposite parties - Consent terms challenged by appellants - Held: Appellants are estopped from questioning the, acts done by respondent 9 - Court can accept the consent terms entered into by the POA holder on behalf of the parties
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)