Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 952 · Decided 5 December 2006
Shah Mansukhlal Chhaganlal (D) Through LRS. v. Gohil Amarsing Govindbhai (D) Through LRS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 952 · [2006] SUPP. 10 S.C.R. 135
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5614/2006
- Decided
- 5 December 2006
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H. KAPADIA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 100
Headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section JOO-Second appeal­ Maintain'!bility of. when substantial question of law not formulated-Held: Not maintainable. Words and Phrases-Expression 'on any other substantial question of law'-Meaning of-In the context of S. I 00(5J of Code of Civil Procedure, present appeal is whether High D Court was justified in allowing the second appeal filed in terms of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Disposing of the appeal and remitting the matter to High-Court, the Court HELD: 1. A perusal of the impugned judgment passed by the High E Court
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)