Supreme Court · 2024 INSC 873 · Decided 18 November 2024
Satyendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2024 INSC 873 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1634
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 12509/2024
- Decided
- 18 November 2024
- Bench
- PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SANDEEP MEHTA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
Headnote
Whether recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory? Whether the inquiry proceedings conducted against the appellant were in gross violation of Rule 7(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Rules, 1999, and is non-est in law. Appeal against disciplinary penalty - Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7(3) - Appellant, an Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, was subject to disciplinary proceedings in 2012
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)