Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 51 · Decided 22 January 2010

Satyanarayana Sultania & ANR. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2010 INSC 51 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 1119
Case number
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 6289/2008
Decided
22 January 2010
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR, CYRIAC JOSEPH (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Criminal

Headnote

A B Madhya Pradesh Schedule Commodity Dealer (Licensing and Restriction on Hoardings) Order, 1991- Clause 11-Confiscation of paddy on account of violation of C clause 11-Legality of-Held: It was incumbent on the part of the transporter to carry documents mentioned in 91flUSe 11 along with docufl'lents were not carried along with the consignment, there was no illegality in the seizure and confiscation thereof.-Madhya Pradesh D Ess~ntial Commodities (Exhibition of Price and Price control) Order, 1997-Clause 6(2). Words and phrases: Expression 'dealef'.-Meaning of - In the context

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)