Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 318 · Decided 5 March 2009
Satish Ambanna Bansode v. State of Maharashtra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 318 · [2009] 3 S.C.R. 1166
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 435/2009
- Decided
- 5 March 2009
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, A.K. GANGULY (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302; Evidence Act Section 32
Headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Conviction under - Victim c set on fire by her husband - Dying declaration of victim - Conviction, on basis thereof by courts below - Held: Justified - Dying declaration does not suffer from infirmity - Courts below examined evidence in detail to place reliance on the. Act, 1872. D Evidence Act, 1872 - s. 32 - Dying declaration - Governing principles - Stated. The question which arose for consideration in this E appeal was whether the courts below were justified in convicting the appellant-husband uls. 302 IPC on basis of the dying declaration of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)