Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 264 · Decided 25 February 2009
Saroj Anand & ORS. v. Prahlad Rai Anand & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 264 · [2009] 3 S.C.R. 428
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1185/2009
- Decided
- 25 February 2009
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, V.S. SIRPURKAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC
Headnote
Practice and procedure - Concession by counsel - Binding effect of - Held: Counsel can make concession on c question of law as also on facts which would be binding on the parties - Decree can be passed on the basis of such concession of parties in terms of 0. XX/I, r. 6 CPC - On facts preliminary made by counsel - Parties were present in the court when order was D passed and could instruct their counsel - Subsequently, parties acted upon it- Thus, they cannot take a contrary stand afterwards - It was for them to spell out the purported misunderstanding between them and counsel - Code
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)