Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 61 · Decided 21 January 2011

Samittri Devi and ANR. v. Sampuran Singh and ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2011 INSC 61 · [2011] 2 S.C.R. 196
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 846/2011
Decided
21 January 2011
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI, H.L. GOKHALE (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Evidence Act Section 114

Headnote

. Bena mi Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988: s. 4 - Benami transaction ._ Suit filed prior to the Act coming into C force to recover the possession of benami property - Held: Would not be hit by the prohibition u/s.4 of the Act. Evidence Act, 1872: s. 114 - Presumption of service - In the certificate from one 0 house to another house on the same road - Inference can be drawn u/s.114 that such notice must have been· duly served in the normal course of business within 5 days. Appellant no.1 purchased the suit house on 26.2.1985 for a consideration of Rs. 40,000. The sale

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)