Supreme Court · 1963 INSC 267 · Decided 20 December 1963
Sait Nagjee Purushotham and CO. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1963 INSC 267 · [1964] 6 S.C.R. 91
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 275/1963
- Decided
- 20 December 1963
- Bench
- A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution; Income Tax Act Section 25(4)
Headnote
fJ S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 91 tained allegations only as regards 6 and not as regards the rest. This would mean that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to find that more than 6 votes had been improperly rejected in his case. If the votes regarding which no plea of impro­ priety had been of the election, therefote, was materially affected by the improper reception or refusal of votes and therefore I consider that the election of J a bar Singh was properly set aside and that is why I concur in the order that the appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)