Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 1029 · Decided 29 December 2006
Sadashiv Dada Patil v. Purshottam Onkar Patil (D) BY LRS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 1029 · [2006] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 843
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4334/2006
- Decided
- 29 December 2006
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948-Sections 2(2), 2(8), 2(9), 31, 32, 32-G and 32-0-Tenancy Act conferring certain statutory rights upon tenant-Section 8 of 1962 Act making existing tenancy law C applicable in respect of watan /and-Landlord contending that Section 8 • read with the Acts are required to be construed harmoniously­ Proviso may create an exception but ordinarily does not create a right or takes away a vested or accrued right-'-Proviso appended to Section 8 of D 1962 Act has limited role to play and does not create any right in favour of the landlord nor
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)