Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 395 · Decided 10 August 2000
S. Saktivel (Dead) BY LRS. v. M. Venugopal Pillai and Ors
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 395 · [2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 361
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1555/1990
- Decided
- 10 August 2000
- Bench
- V.N. KHARE, S.N. VARIAVA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act Section 92
Headnote
Indian Evidence Act 1872-Section 92 proviso 4-Suit for partition­ Plaintiff claiming a share on the basis of a registered settlement deed­ De.fendant alleging a subsequent oral .(amity arrangement modifying the terms A B uf settlement-Whether parol evidence can be let in to substantiate a deed-Held, no. The respondent - plaintiff, one of the three sons of deceased 'M' filed a suit for partition against his brother viz. the appellants' father under a registered settlement deed executed by the deceased 'M' in 1915. The D deceased defendant contended that as a result of a
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)