Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 233 · Decided 23 February 2009
S.K. JAIN. v. State of Haryana and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 233 · [2009] 2 S.C.R. 1080
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1156/2009
- Decided
- 23 February 2009
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, V.S. SIRPURKAR, A.K. GANGULY (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution; Arbitration Act Section 31(8), 38
Headnote
1080 r A S.K. JAIN. t v )r- .... J STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. } Civil appeal No .. 1156 of 2009 B FEBRUARY 23, 2009· ' (DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, V.S. SIRPURKAR AND ASOK ) . KUMAR GANGULY, :JJ) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : +- c ss. 31 (8) and 38 - Arbitration agreement requiring the into service to get over the agreement - High Court rightly held . that contractor was required to make the deposit. ~ D _.: ). " The respondent-Government allotted to the appellant ~ contractor the work of constructing its office building.The I dispute having arisen between the parties,
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)