Supreme Court · 1992 INSC 344 · Decided 16 December 1992
Rukmini Amma Saradamma v. Kall Yani Sulochana and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1992 INSC 344 · [1992] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 579
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5403/1992
- Decided
- 16 December 1992
- Bench
- M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. MOHAN, A.S. ANAND (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 115
Headnote
B Kera/a Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965: Section 2o-Revisional Jurisdiction-Scope of-Wliether revisional court has jurisdic­ tion to reappreciate evidence-Second revision to the High Court under Sec- tion 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908--Permissibility of. C Civil Procedure could reappreciate evidence. The appellant-landlady filed a petition for eviction of the first respondent-tenant froin the schedule premises, on the ground that the D first respondent had committed default of rent and that she was entitled to recover possession of the shed for demolition. The
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)