Supreme Court · 2019 INSC 1236 · Decided 13 November 2019
Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank LTD. & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2019 INSC 1236 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8588/2019
- Decided
- 13 November 2019
- Bench
- RANJAN GOGOI, N.V. RAMANA, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJIV KHANNA (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution
Headnote
Tribunals - Finance Act, 2017 - Finance Act, 2017, a 'money bill' or not u/Art.110 - Validity of the Act, 2017 - Held: The majority in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5) pronounced the nature of the impugned enactment without first delineating the scope for interpretation or the repercussions of such process - The majority dictum in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5) did not substantially discuss the effect of the word 'only' in Art.110(1) and offers little guidance on the repercussions of a finding when some of the provisions
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)