Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 248 · Decided 30 April 2002
Ravinder Singh @ Bittu v. The State of Maharashtra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2002 INSC 248 · [2002] 3 S.C.R. 622
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 805/2001
- Decided
- 30 April 2002
- Bench
- U.C. BANERJEE, Y.K. SABHARWAL (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302, 120, 34, 3, 25; Arms Act Section 25, 307
Headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 120 !PC-Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 read with 34, 307 read with 34 and 392 read with 34. Explosive Substances Act, 1984- s.3.-Arms Act, 1959-s.25. Prosecution under-Reliance on corifessional statements conviction upheld. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987-Section 15--Corifessional statements-Reliance on-Corroboration for-Held, voluntary and truthfal statement does not require corroboration. Appellant-accused and co-accused were convicted by Designated Court under Sections 3 and 4 of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)