Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 169 · Decided 25 March 2010
Ravichandran v. State BY DY. SUPERIN. of Police, Madras
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 169 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 313
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 909/2003
- Decided
- 25 March 2010
- Bench
- MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, H.L. DATTU (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC; CrPC Section 394(2), 394; Prevention of Corruption Act Section 5(1)(d), 5(2)
Headnote
Penal Code, 1860: A B ss. 120-8, 4201120-8, 477A/120-8 and s.5(1)(d)/5(2) of c Prevention of Corruption Act - Interpolation and forgery in permit for palmolein oil - Conviction by trial court, affirmed by High Court - HELD: There is no evidence on record to indicate any link to prove and and forgery was done by any of the accused persons.namely, D A 1, A2 or A4 - Only because A4 is the brother of A3, it does not in any manner prove and establish that he had knowledge that the permit was interpolated when he had presented it before the office of the Federation - In the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)