Supreme Court · 2017 INSC 954 · Decided 15 September 2017
Ratanlal v. Prahlad Jat & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2017 INSC 954 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 682
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 499/2014
- Decided
- 15 September 2017
- Bench
- JASTI CHELAMESWAR, S. ABDUL NAZEER (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302, 201, 342, 120B; CrPC Section 311; Constitution Article 136
Headnote
8 S.C.R. 682 RATANLAL v. PRAHLAD JAT & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 499 of2014) SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.J Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.311 - Object of - Held: In order to enable the court to find C out the truth and render a just decision, the salutary any person in attendance though not summoned as a witness or recall or re-examine any D person already examined who are expected to be able to throw light upon the matter in dispute - The object of the provision as a whole is to do justice not only from the point of view of the accused and the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)