Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 58 · Decided 12 January 1996
Ranganath Parmeswar Pandjtrao Mali and ANR. v. Eknath Gajanan Kulkarni and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 58 · [1996] 1 S.C.R. 454
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1651/1996
- Decided
- 12 January 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 136
Headnote
Co11.witution of India, 1950 : Article 136 Appeal-Finding of fact-Non-consideration of vital evidenc~Such C a finding can be inteifered with. Law of inheritance: Factun1 of 1narriage-Proo.f o_f-Suit for injunction by legal heirs--Claim ,for property based on inheritance from ancestors-DiJpute as D and w(f~Fact corroborated Dy admission-Held a presumption arises as to valid marriage unless rebutted-Legal heirs held entitled to succeed to property. E The appellant-plaintiffs filed a suit seeking relief of injunction praying that the respondent-defendants be restrained from obstructing
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)