Supreme Court · 1964 INSC 137 · Decided 28 April 1964
Ramnikal Pitambardas Mehta v. Indradaman Amratlal Sheth
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1964 INSC 137 · [1964] 8 S.C.R. 1
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 61/1964
- Decided
- 28 April 1964
- Bench
- A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
RAMNIKAL PITAMBARDAS MEHTA y, INDRADAMAN AMRATLAL SHETH (A. K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL JJ.) Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 19'47, s. 13(1) (g). (hh).-Premis" required bonafide for occupation aft<r carrying out repairs-Sub-section if house including the portion occu­ pied by •PPellaot, for his residential purpose. The defence of the appe­ llant was that respondent did not reasonably and bona fide require the premises for his occupation and for carrying out repairs. The trial court decreed the suit of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)