Supreme Court · 1992 INSC 62 · Decided 4 March 1992
Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1992 INSC 62 · [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3570/1991
- Decided
- 4 March 1992
- Bench
- M. FATHIMA BEEVI, S.C. AGRAWAL (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 1
Headnote
B '>- Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Order 1, Rule lo-lmpleadment of party by Court to a suit as necessary party-Necessary or proper party-Wlzo is-Distinction between necessary and c proper partJSuit filed by a plaintiff, in possession of service station under an agreement, with lessee thereof for demolition of stntctures raised by plaintiff as unauthorised-Lessee seeking impleadment as additional defendant as neces- sary party-Wlzether Court could direct plaintiff to add lessee as defendant in D suit-Wlzether Court has discretion to direct a plaintiff, though dominus litis, to
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)