Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 239 · Decided 11 May 1999

Ramesh Chand Bansal and ANR. v. District MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR Ghaziabad and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1999 INSC 239 · [1999] 3 S.C.R. 462
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 229/1997
Decided
11 May 1999
Bench
AJAY PRAKASH MISRA, N. SANTOSH HEGDE (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Stamp Act

Headnote

CHAND BANSAL AND ANR. v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR GHAZIABAD AND ORS. MAY I I, 1999 B [A.P. MISRA AND N. SANTOSH HEGDE. JJ.] ' F Stamp Act-U.P. Act XI of 1969 Section 47-A-U.P. Stamp Rules, 1942- Rule 340-A(a) Circle Rate is a prima facie determination of the value of the land by the collector is undervalued in relation to the circle rate, then the matter is to be referred to the collector and the property owner has the right to prove the correctness of the valuation as submitted by him. D E The appeal is against the dismissal of writ petition, challenging a circular dated 29th

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)