Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 589 · Decided 31 October 2003

Ramanand Yada V v. Prabhu Nath Jha and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2003 INSC 589 · [2003] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 42
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 119/1997
Decided
31 October 2003
Bench
DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 34, 149, 302; Arms Act Section 34, 149, 302, 25A, 27

Headnote

" Criminal Trial c Practice and procedure--Order of acquittal-Interference by appellate Court-When-Held: When there are compelling and substantial reasons for doing do as miscarriage of justice may result from acquittal of guilty-No embargo on re-appreciation of evidence by appellate 34, 149 and 302-Arms Act, 1959-&ctions 25A and 27- D Explosive Substance Act, 1908-Section 3. Appreciation of evidence--Opinion evidence-Inconsistency between evidence of medical witness and eye witness-Evidentiary value-Held, oral evidence to get primacy as medical evidence is

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)