Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 106 · Decided 27 February 2002
Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu & ORS. v. Gobaradhan Sao and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2002 INSC 106 · [2002] 2 S.C.R. 77
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1704/2002
- Decided
- 27 February 2002
- Bench
- M.B. SHAH, B.N. AGRAWAL (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 22; Limitation Act Section 5, 22
Headnote
Limitation Act ,1963: Section 5 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 22 Rule 9 Expression,- 'Sufficient cause '-Interpretation of-Should receive liberal construction so as to advance justice when there is no inaction, negligence or A B c lack of bona fide on the part of party-Whether explanation case-On facts held rejection of prayer for condonation of delay and setting aside abatement D by High Court held not justified. During hearing of appeal, one of the appellants informed his counsel that some of the appellants had expired. The counsel instructed him to obtain and file vakalatnama
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)