Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 33 · Decided 18 January 2006
Ram Bachan Rai and ORS. v. Ram Udar Rai and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 33 · [2006] 1 S.C.R. 455
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1100/2000
- Decided
- 18 January 2006
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, TARUN CHATTERJEE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Matter referred to larger bench
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Limitation Act Section 136
Headnote
B .... y Limitaion Act, 1963: Article 136-limitationfor execution of decree-Held, reference having c already been made to a three Judge Bench in ehiranji Lal's case; the malter may also be placed along with that case. On the question whether the period of limitation for filing the petition for becomes enforceable, i.e. when it is signed, D \&._\ Refefring the matter to a three Judge Bench, the Court HELD. There is some area of conflict amongst several two-Judge Bench decisions of the Court. Noticing the conflict, reference has been made to a three-Judge Bench in Chiranji Lat's
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)