Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 220 · Decided 19 April 2010

Ram Babu v. State of U.P.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2010 INSC 220 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 771
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 475/2008
Decided
19 April 2010
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM, RAJENDRA MAL LODHA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 395; Evidence Act Section 9

Headnote

Evidence Act, 1872 - s. 9 - Test identification parade - Relevance of - Held: Identification parade belongs to investigation stage - Its purpose is to test and strengthen C trustworthiness of the substantive evidence of a witness in court - Evidence with regard to test identification parade may be precautions are ensured - On facts, accused committed offence of dacoity - Conviction u/s. 395 /PC and sentence of D five years rigorous imprisonment by courts below, on basis of identification does not call for interference - Identification of accused established by substantive evidence duly

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)