Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 460 · Decided 30 September 2005

Rakesh Vij v. Raminder Pal Singh Sethi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2005 INSC 460 · [2005] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 777
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2894/2001
Decided
30 September 2005
Bench
R.C. LAHOTI, G.P. MATHUR, P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN (3-judge bench)
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 14

Headnote

B Rent Control and Eviction: East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949: Section 13-Eviction Petition-Bona tide requirement-Non-residential building-Jn Union Territory Chandigarh-Landlord was co-owner of premises described as Shop-cum-Flat-Landlord filed an eviction petition under S. 13 of 1949 clinic with modern gadgets for which space currently in his o.:cupation was wholly inadequate-The 1949 Act was amended by the 1956 D Amendment Act as a result of which the landlord could only seek eviction of a tenant from a residential or a scheduled building, but was completely deprived of his

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)