Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 383 · Decided 8 August 2000
Rakesh Kumar Jain v. State Through Cbi, New Delhi
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 383 · [2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 275
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 555/1999
- Decided
- 8 August 2000
- Bench
- K.T. THOMAS, R.P. SETHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 245, 470(3), 473, 470; Prevention of Corruption Act
Headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Sections 245, 470(3) & 473-0.fficial Secrets Act, 1923-Sections 5(4) rlw 5(2) and (3) & 13(3)-Complaint under-Filed beyond limitation period-Due to delay in obtaining sanction­ Plea that since no sanction is required under the Act, the accused should be spent in obtaining the sanction cannot be excluded under Explanation to Section 470( 3 )-'-But mere delay does not entitle the accused to be discharged, because the complainant is entitled to extention of period of limitation u/s. 473. Words & Phrases-'Made by order of'-Meaning of in the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)