Supreme Court · 1988 INSC 64 · Decided 7 March 1988
Rakesh Kumar & Shri Shakti Kumar v. Hindustan Everest Tool LTD.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1988 INSC 64 · [1988] 3 S.C.R. 88
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 933/1988
- Decided
- 7 March 1988
- Bench
- SABYASACHI MUKHERJI, S. RANGANATHAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Transfer of Property Act Section 106; Rent Control Act Section 14
Headnote
J.., Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958: s. 14( J)(a)-Eviction-Notice of demand by landlord for arrears of rent-Validity of-To be construed ~ as understood by common man. c Section 14(l)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, i958 provides for recovery of possession of the demised premises, where the tenant two \ months of the date on which notice of demand had been served on him in the manner provided ins. 106 ofthe Transfer of Property Act, i882. D Under the lease agreement the respondent-tenant was required to pay rent in advance by the Sib ofeach calendar month. The appellant- landlords by
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)