Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 594 · Decided 19 August 2011
Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Others v. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Another
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2011 INSC 594 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 513
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4307/2007
- Decided
- 19 August 2011
- Bench
- DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R. DAVE (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Consumer Protection Act Section 12, 13, 14
Headnote
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986: Sections 12, 13 and 14 - Power of review and to set aside ex parte orders - Held: District Consumer Forums and State Commissions have not been given any power to set aside ex parte orders and power of review and the powers which have A expressly given by the statute cannot be exercised. 0 Section 22 (as amended in 2002) read with ss. 12, 13 and 14 ands. 22-A (as introduced in 2002) - Power and procedure applicable to National Commission and power to set aside ex parte orders - Held: After amendment in s. 22 and introduction of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)